Seth

Considering Dr. Pinna's lack of credibility (BTW, if you look at the link you posted you will see that the very first words are drpinna), I began to wondering if this is even a Gabe Mirkin article at all. I could not find it on the real Dr. Mirkin's website and a google search didn't turn it up either. Finally blogspot did the trick. There was never any such article.
Well, it turns out Dr. Pinna simply cut and pasted excerpts from three different different Dr. Mirkin blog posts and gave the impression that it was one article. Pinna took parts of Mirin's April 5, 2011 blog on HPV/cancer, Mirkin's blog entry a full year ago on June 19,2010 which was the one on HPV/ skin cancer and a Mirkin blog on March 10, 2010 about Cofactors for cancer.

That's why I objected to your linking directly to Pinna's page; he's just not credible plus hawks fraudlent products.
Like most quacks, he puts in just enough real stuff to trick readers. Technically his composite of three blog entries spanning a full year is "Dr. Mirkin on skin cancer", but it's hardly a Dr. Mirkin article. Pinna also left out some of Mirkin's cautions and common sense.

I know I'm a bit of nag on this, but I have always like Dr. Mirkin and this "article" seemed too loose with the facts to be truly his. At least Pinna left in Dr. Mirkin's cites to a real medical article.

Charm