| |
#79483 08-27-2008 03:01 PM | Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 27 Contributing Member (25+ posts) | | Contributing Member (25+ posts) Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 27 | I just got the bad news from my dentist and an endodontist that the preferred treatment for my tooth is extraction and then a bridge. I'm reluctant to do this because of the risk of complications from the extraction.
The alternative is to remove and replace a 40+ year old root canal, then attach posts to the new root canal to attach the new crown as there is nothing left of the tooth to attach a crown to. the endodontist ordinarily wouldn't try this approach.
My idea of just leaving the tooth alone got rejected because the old root canal is no longer sterile and will infect.
My question is: does the risk of osteoradionecrosis and/or other complications decrease over time or does it increase or stay the same? Any other advice or suggestions from the dental experts out there would be greatly appreciated.
thanks marilyn
dx: Stage 3 T2N2aM0 Left tonsil, base of tongue, 1 left node. HPV positive. tx: Tonsilectomy (left) then Cisplatin x2, Erbitux x7, IMRT x35 Phase 3 clinical trial. Completed 6/28/07
| | |
| Forums23 Topics18,286 Posts197,241 Members13,439 | | Most Online2,386 Nov 19th, 2025 | | |
This is another custom island. This one could be used for ads. This spot is one of the best places for ads on your site to be placed. This can be enabled/disabled on a per forum basis.
| | | |
| |