I know this is a repetitive post but having been treated at a CCC (Johns Hopkins), I can attest for the level of care I received. Fortunately, I didn't have to look too far away. The US News report, the fact that a friend was successfully treated there and the credentials of my team was enough to know I had selected a Cadillac as cancer hospitals go (insurance covered it too).

However I agree with Mamacita that we shouldn't just "blindly" decide to be treated at a CCC just because it is a CCC. You still have to check out the team and feel comfortable and confident in them. I also agree that a teaching facility is a plus as they will attract some of the brightest and best.

My decision was made even easier based on my negative experience locally. Also, what made my decision easier was the fact that my ENT/Surgeon and RO treated my friend's BOT cancer. He is a musician as well and they saved his life. He's 2 years NED, performing/singing again and doing fine. Finally, upon researching my team members, I found them to be some of the brightest and best in their fields.

IMO, one aspect that is vital regardless of the facility is the "team" approach. CCCs, to best of my knowledge use the "team" approach and the team then consults with a tumor board where even more experts discuss your case. Knowing my team were in constant contact with each other concerning my case was quite comforting. My experience locally was the complete opposite.

Bottom line, I definitely agree with going to a CCC but it doesn't mean you cannot be treated with the same level of success any elsewhere. Ultimately, it comes down to logistics, insurance, financial consideration, confidence in your doctors and your own gut feeling.

"T"