It's not secret that I have and will continue to object to posting false information and false statistics on OCF in a hard line tone. Why? Because even after Brian asks as nicely as possible:
[quote]While this doesn't necessarily apply to you, you would be surprised at the number of posters that will post some bit of information from an unreliable internet source, or a source with an agenda, such as to sell people things, or promote a perspective that is contrary to what peer reviewed papers indicate. We wish to ensure that we are only giving out accurate information.[/quote]
What does he get in return: Almost the textbook definition of unreliable internet garbage: A 5 year old petition dismissed by the FDA and the courts and a nut job columnist who would be right at home in the Star or Globe along with UFO sightings.
What causes cancer is not a topic to be spreading false information about under the passive/aggressive cover of
[quote]What do you think?[/quote]
The majority of OCF readers do not have the time or inclination to research and expose fraudulent postings and trust their OCF member not to post total garbage. If even one OCF reader had decided not to give their child the vaccine based on the false information here, that is one too many.
No apologies just a promise of vigilance and protection..
Charm