Hi,
For what it's worth, I've been told that a lesion can be viewed different ways. That is why when you get a second opinion from a different cancer center (or more) they always insist on seeing your slides so their pathology dept. can have a go at it. I had mine viewed as moderately well diff. & well diff. (from one place), Then it was labeled "superficially invasive" by another, and then I was faced with a metastasis to a lymph node, called met. rather than reoccurence because it happened within about a month of the biopsy excision! My last stop called it "moderately well", and the lymph node a met. because there was no cancer left in my tongue when they recut. I am no expert, but I would say that judging the histology of the lesion is at least partly the decision/view of the particular pathologist. I am also sure that they try to quantify it as best they can to take some of the opinion of out it. (there's hedging an opinion for you)
Anne

Last edited by AnneO; 03-17-2011 06:37 PM.

SCC tongue 9/2010, excised w/clear margins:8 X 4 mm, 1 mm deep
Neck Met, 10/2010, 1 cm lymph node; 12/21/'10: Neck Diss 30 nodes, 29 clear, micro ECE node, part tongue gloss, no residual scc
IMRT & 6 cisplatin 1/20/11-2/28/11 at MDA
GIST tumor sarcoma, removed 9/2011, no chemo needed
Clear on both counts as of Fall, 2021