No David.... While I fit the profile, we talked about science, not my journey. I really am not the demographic for the magazine's readers, though I am a subscriber, and think it has lots of good health info in it. They need some younger, at risk person who 20-30 year olds can identify with; me I've got one foot in the ground already, so I don't qualify as the poster boy anymore.
Clearly from the Woman's Health story she has already done much homework. She had asked me for input on the Woman's Journal story, but I was traveling lecturing when she was assembling the data and not able to contribute. She reached out to me this time early. I thought she did a good job in the first article though it has some technical inaccuracies which I hope get set straight in the Men's version. I also think there are stronger medical authorities she could interview this time around. But all this is out of my hands.