My mother-in-law found an article in Parade (the insert found in Sunday papers) regarding proton therapy used in cancer treatment. Does anyone know anything about this?

Type proton into the search box in the upper right of each page -- a number of posts pop up.

I do know that MD Anderson has been doing some research in this area and I found this

http://www.mdanderson.org/care_centers/radiationonco/ptc/

Head and Neck is listed, but not linked.

Kevin

This is very nice.... in principle. It solves the problem with the exit radiation. The protons only penetrate to a certain (selectable) depth. Therefore there is much less tissue damage.
On the other hand there are just VERY few places (6?) where they do this (as opposed to IMRT). I am not aware if there are results for sizeable cohort (Brian?). I tried to look into this and my GP and myself contacted the FL center.... no response.

Timeliness of the treatment and accessibility are major concerns and may negate potential advantages of proton therapy!

M

Loma Linda and a couple other places are doing it on a limited basis. But it is not the mainstream choice right now. Remember that targeting is really great in brain etc. but in areas where the tumor is more diverse, invasion into surrounding tissues more likely, too targeted a beam does not do the task. Gary is the one we need to email about this, he's the radiation guru.

It also sounds as though it would only be suitable for tumors determined to be 'non-surgical.' My tumor, for example, was removed surgically and radiation was used to kill off any remaining cancer cells, that may or may not have been there. The proton therapy would be used to target just the tumor itself and not larger fields.

Very cool stuff though!

There was an article about IMPT (Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy) in the Journal of Oncology about a year and a half ago. It mentioned MD Anderson as one of the places that uses it, in fact has an entire building donated to it's use. The article described it's advantages over say IMRT in that it is like a smart bomb. It can be programmed to seek out a specific tumor and actually conform to its internal shape and "explode" inside killing the tumor but sparing surrounding tissues. The article was a BIT more technical than my summary. It's uses are obviously suited for hard to reach tumors as in the brain or other sensitive areas but as Brain says it would not be suited for an area as great as most of us have to have radiated. I kept that magazine around in my office forever and now I can't find it!!

LVH Muhlenberg Hospital in Bethlehem, Pa will be building a section for proton therapy...very expensive. And from what I understand the machines weigh a lot...a whole lot. Much more then the IMRT. The next closest center that is doing this is in Boston, Ma....from where I'm located. Not many exist.

I was down at St. Jude this morning and asked one of the Physicist that we work with on a regular basis about this. His take is that it is an up and coming technology and they are very excited about it due to the fact that it does not do damage to the surrounding tissue. He added this is especially important in pediatric cases because the little one are still growing.

When they got their machine, they built the building back around it. It was too big and heavy to do anything else. Didn't get a chance to go see (it was on the other side of the campus) but have an open invitation to do so.

Very cool !

Kevin

To be even more exotic, there is the emerging possibility that antiprotons are even more effective! (how is that for science fiction). Antimatter to the rescue!

Perhaps the lower collateral damage would allow dose escalation and shorter duration of therapy.

Realistically however, IMRT (and variations) will be the Rad Tx of choice for many years to come and this is also available in smaller towns

M