#79592 08-29-2008 09:21 AM | Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 2,019 Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | OP Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 2,019 | http://www.livescience.com/health/080829-happy-thoughts.htmlThis is from a blog (but a reputable one) so I wasn't sure if it would make the RSS feed. It does mention one study showing no correlation between positive thinking and outcomes fo head and neck cancer. It's also just an interesting article in general. Nelie
SCC(T2N0M0) part.glossectomy & neck dissect 2/9/05 & 2/25/05.33 IMRT(66 Gy),2 Cisplatin ended 06/03/05.Stage I breast cancer treated 2/05-11/05.Surgery to remove esophageal stricture 07/06, still having dilatations to keep esophagus open.Dysphagia. "When you're going through hell, keep going"
| | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 4,918 Likes: 64 OCF Founder Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | OCF Founder Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 4,918 Likes: 64 | It's an interesting article but it wouldn't have made the news feed because it offers no conclusions that are not open to discussion still.
What makes an opinion blog a reputable one? By nature they are unmoderated, the information is not vetted by anyone, open to opinion etc. I think they are an interesting thing, and I read several that I follow because I like the ideas that the writer has, but I don't read them because they are necessarily a means of putting factual information out there. There are numerous books out now on how to get your product, idea, whatever to spread by virally through the blogosphere. How they can be used (in the guise of disseminating information from what appears to be a credible source) to actually selling an idea or product to you. We ain't in Kansas anymore Dorothy.....
Brian, stage 4 oral cancer survivor. OCF Founder and Director. The first responsibility of a leader is to define reality. The last is to say thank you. In between, the leader is a servant. | | | | Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 2,019 Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | OP Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 2,019 | But surely the RSS feed includes science reporting from newspaper articles that does not report new research or offer form conclusions? IN fact, good science reporting, to me, requires reporting when there is conflicting research.
I say this is good reporting because all the articles I have read on this blog (which I admit I only read once in a while, but still have read several articles) only report on primary research originally reported in peer reviewed journals and often quote the authors of that research for how they would sum it up, instead of simply giving the reporter's opinion on what they read. Also they seem to be very good at reporting both sides of an issue when there is research to support both sides. This blog is commercial, but it is edited, like the New York Times or any other paper, and the parent company appears to be targeting people with some education and scientific literacy.
Not all blogs are created equal and not all blogs are just some person about whom you know little or nothing spouting their opinion. One can be a critical consumer of information in the blogosphere as elsewhere. None of this is to say I think the RSS feed needs to include stuff from blogs, even good ones like this.
Nelie
SCC(T2N0M0) part.glossectomy & neck dissect 2/9/05 & 2/25/05.33 IMRT(66 Gy),2 Cisplatin ended 06/03/05.Stage I breast cancer treated 2/05-11/05.Surgery to remove esophageal stricture 07/06, still having dilatations to keep esophagus open.Dysphagia. "When you're going through hell, keep going"
| | |
Forums23 Topics18,235 Posts197,106 Members13,292 | Most Online1,788 Jan 23rd, 2025 | | | |