#39230 10-04-2005 08:16 AM | Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 11 Member | OP Member Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 11 | Hello, can someone decipher the following pathologic staging code of my tongue lesion? pT1pNOMX Thanks, Hal | | |
#39231 10-04-2005 08:47 PM | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 3,552 Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 3,552 | Sort of - algebraically subtracting "p" from the equation would yield T1N0MX which would mean
T1 = Tumor ≤2 cm in greatest dimension N0 = No regional lymph node metastasis MX = Distant metastasis cannot be assessed
To the best of my knowledge there is no "p" designator in the AJCC TMN classification system. Preliminary maybe?
Gary Allsebrook *********************************** Dx 11/22/02, SCC, 6 x 3 cm Polypoid tumor, rt tonsil, Stage III/IVA, T3N0M0 G1/2 Tx 1/28/03 - 3/19/03, Cisplatin ct x2, IMRT, bilateral, with boost, x35(69.96Gy) ________________________________________________________ "You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes" (James 4:14 NIV)
| | |
#39232 10-05-2005 04:26 PM | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 4,918 Likes: 64 OCF Founder Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | OCF Founder Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 4,918 Likes: 64 | The good news is that this is a very early diagnosis.... By using the X instead of an 0, they likely have not done any testing of any distant locations, with something such as a PET. Making the assumption that if it isn't in the lymph system it hasn't gone elsewhere. Please note the use of the word assumption. While they are likely safe in that posture, I was told once that assumption is the mother of all major F$%^&k- ups. But on the scale of staging this is not a horrible place to be on the oral cancer scale. (Not that any place on it is good.)
Brian, stage 4 oral cancer survivor. OCF Founder and Director. The first responsibility of a leader is to define reality. The last is to say thank you. In between, the leader is a servant. | | |
#39233 10-06-2005 03:59 PM | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 4,918 Likes: 64 OCF Founder Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | OCF Founder Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 4,918 Likes: 64 | Hal sent me an email with some updates on what some of this means... I think it is worth putting up here, but it may delve into an area that falls into the realm of "how do I use that information?" Nevertheless, it's something that we should know for future ref.
posted October 06, 2005 11:07 AM
Brian, stage 4 oral cancer survivor. OCF Founder and Director. The first responsibility of a leader is to define reality. The last is to say thank you. In between, the leader is a servant. | | |
#39234 10-06-2005 04:28 PM | Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 2,019 Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 2,019 | I'm very familair with what a p-value is but for this to be a p-value it *has* to be followed by a probability. Unless p is simply used as shorthand for "probably" here. In which case it isn't a p-value, it's just shorthand.
I though MX meant no metastasis but tests (lung scan, liver scan etc. ) have not been done so it's really undetermined. That's the way it worked in my diagnosis, Firts I was MX, then after the tests I was M0.
SCC(T2N0M0) part.glossectomy & neck dissect 2/9/05 & 2/25/05.33 IMRT(66 Gy),2 Cisplatin ended 06/03/05.Stage I breast cancer treated 2/05-11/05.Surgery to remove esophageal stricture 07/06, still having dilatations to keep esophagus open.Dysphagia. "When you're going through hell, keep going"
| | |
#39235 10-06-2005 10:09 PM | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 3,552 Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 3,552 | I know what a "p" value is (p= probability) but could not find any correlation to it and the TMN classification system. It's part of a statistical formula usually used in research more than Dx protocol. But here you go: http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/pvalues.html The good news, as Brian said, in the scheme of things, that's a pretty decent Dx. That means they caught it early. Like Nelie said, the MX part is yet to be determined and more than likely just a conservative rating anyway.
Gary Allsebrook *********************************** Dx 11/22/02, SCC, 6 x 3 cm Polypoid tumor, rt tonsil, Stage III/IVA, T3N0M0 G1/2 Tx 1/28/03 - 3/19/03, Cisplatin ct x2, IMRT, bilateral, with boost, x35(69.96Gy) ________________________________________________________ "You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes" (James 4:14 NIV)
| | |
#39236 10-06-2005 10:19 PM | Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 2,019 Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 2,019 | Actually the p-value IS the probability. That's why it is called a "value". The number is presented in research publication with p= or p< before it so there's no ambiguity about what the number means. So again, the letter p without a number is not a p value. Just some statistical trivia for y'all.......
SCC(T2N0M0) part.glossectomy & neck dissect 2/9/05 & 2/25/05.33 IMRT(66 Gy),2 Cisplatin ended 06/03/05.Stage I breast cancer treated 2/05-11/05.Surgery to remove esophageal stricture 07/06, still having dilatations to keep esophagus open.Dysphagia. "When you're going through hell, keep going"
| | |
#39237 10-07-2005 04:49 AM | Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,384 Likes: 1 Patient Advocate (1000+ posts) | Patient Advocate (1000+ posts) Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,384 Likes: 1 | "p" in this case should mean pathological. I found more information at this web site: http://training.seer.cancer.gov/module_staging_cancer/unit03_sec03_part04_ajcc_guidelines.html The excerpts below explain the subject. 16. Each component may be individually defined as clinical or pathological, such as pT3 cN0 cM0. When components with mixed staging bases are stage grouped, the general clinical and pathologic rules for classification apply. For example, clinical M categories may be used for pathologic stage grouping, but pathologic T categories should not be stage grouped with clinically stage grouped cases. 17. The category X is used in each element to indicate that there has been no assessment of that characteristic of the tumor. It is important to differentiate the fact that no attempt was made to assess the element from the fact that nothing was found. For example, NX means that no diagnostic tools were used to evaluate the status of lymph nodes, and N0 means that no lymph node involvement was found by radiography or other methods. 18. If a stage grouping contains the term "any," such as Any T or Any N, the stage grouping is based on other elements and it does not matter what that T or N is. Consequently, even missing information including the X (not assessed) category is acceptable for that element in that stage group. For example, the chest CT scan for a lung cancer patient documents that there is a large mass on the right side and contralateral mediastinal lymph nodes involved. This case would be staged as N3. Assuming that distant metastases are ruled out (M0), it would not matter the size or location of the primary tumor, because the N3 M0 combination is a stage group IIIB. If distant metastases were present (M1), neither the size of the primary nor the lymph node involvement would matter, because the case is automatically stage group IV.
Mark, 21 Year survivor, SCC right tonsil, 3 nodes positive, one with extra-capsular spread. I never asked what stage (would have scared me anyway) Right side tonsillectomy, radical neck dissection right side, maximum radiation to both sides, no chemo, no PEG, age 40 when diagnosed.
| | |
#39238 10-14-2005 02:34 PM | Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 129 Gold Member (100+ posts) | Gold Member (100+ posts) Joined: Aug 2005 Posts: 129 | Hal- Just curious-how did you catch this so early? It seems with alot of the tongue cancers it is hard to detect at such an early stage. What part of the tongue is it? I would love to hear about your story/symptoms. Hopefully by sharing this info it may help someone else catch their symptoms early too. Thanks Tami
Tami Mom has Bot scc stage T1/N1= stage 3 dx 6/27/05 treatment IMRT & chemo (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5FU) ended treatment 8/22/05 Cancer free as of Feb 2006
| | |
#39239 10-14-2005 03:18 PM | Joined: Jul 2003 Posts: 1,163 Patient Advocate (1000+ posts) | Patient Advocate (1000+ posts) Joined: Jul 2003 Posts: 1,163 | Hello Hal,
Was your dx from a biospy? Did you have surgery to remove the lesion? Please post again with more details about how you discovered it and what treatment you have received so far. What is your treatment plan? The more we know the more information we can give you.
All my Best, Danny Boy
Daniel Bogan DX 7/16/03 Right tonsil,SCC T4NOMO. right side neck disection, IMRT Radiation x 33.
Recurrance in June 05 in right tonsil area. Now receiving palliative chemo (Erbitux) starting 3/9/06
Our good friend and loved member of the forum has passed away RIP Dannyboy 7-16-2006
| | |
Forums23 Topics18,235 Posts197,106 Members13,295 | Most Online1,788 Jan 23rd, 2025 | | | |