| Joined: Feb 2014 Posts: 17 Member | OP Member Joined: Feb 2014 Posts: 17 | Can anyone tell me what criteria is used to determine whether I should get just Radiation, or Radiation and Chemo. My tumor board was split down the middle, so now I'm confused on what to do.
The RO said there was a US study and one in Europe that showed no benefits to adding Chemo to the Radiation treatment when there is NO EXTRA NODAL EXTENSION. I had 5 positive lymphnodes, 3 in stage 1 section of neck 1 in Stage 3 of neck, and 1 in Stage 4 of my neck.. all with no extra nodal extension....I have to decide quick, I'm supposed to start Radiation on Monday... and I'm unsure of what to do. So many posts I see all have Chemo and Radiation.
Should I ask them for the Chemo too?
Obviously do not want it if it will not help me... but scared to make wrong choice. Can you please share any insight you have on this subject, would be greatly appreciated.
Thankyou. Angela
SCC 12/13 - T1N0 1/28/13 - removal of tumor Rt. Tongue clear margins 5/14 lump under chin, 8/14 FNA showed C and CAT 8/25 neck dissection, 14nodes removed 9 clear 5 with C Extra Nodal Extension not present 9/9/14 tumor board meeting to determine RAD and poss chemo treatment
| | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,606 Likes: 2 Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,606 Likes: 2 | Extra nodal extension just means it has not perforated the lymph node capsule so there is less likelihood of metastases.
If you aren't comfortable, seek a second opinion. A tumor board split would encourage me to do exactly that. Best 2 out of 3 sounds better than a coin toss.
SCC Stage IV, BOT, T2N2bM0 Cisplatin/5FU x 3, 40 days radiation Diagnosis 07/21/03 tx completed 10/08/03 Post Radiation Lower Motor Neuron Syndrome 3/08. Cervical Spinal Stenosis 01/11 Cervical Myelitis 09/12 Thoracic Paraplegia 10/12 Dysautonomia 11/12 Hospice care 09/12-01/13. COPD 01/14 Intermittent CHF 6/15 Feeding tube NPO 03/16 VFI 12/2016 ORN 12/2017 Cardiac Event 06/2018 Bilateral VFI 01/2021 Thoracotomy Bilobectomy 01/2022 Bilateral VFI 05/2022 Total Laryngectomy 01/2023
| | | | Joined: Aug 2011 Posts: 269 Gold Member (200+ posts) | Gold Member (200+ posts) Joined: Aug 2011 Posts: 269 | I'm sure you will get some opinions here, and I think I've seen some for you in another thread. I feel absolutely miserable for you, such a difficult decision. My hope for you is that you will be ok with the decision you make. I decided my first round with this cancer not to get radiation, and my cancer returned. It probably would not have returned if I had done the rads the first time. However I have absolutely no regrets. I took a chance and lost. I was not even close to mentally/emotionally handling it the first time. So, as strange as it sounds, I believe it was meant to work out exactly like it did. All the very best to you, I will continue to keep track of your progress here on the forum.
Nancy (53 at dx) Metastatic SCC. Stage III. HPV positive with occult primary. N1, no ecs 7/1/11 - L-Selective neck dissection. Tonsillectomy. All clean. No rad, no chemo. 5/29/13 - Found primary 7/3/13 - TORS 7/8/13 - Emergency Surgery/Blood vessel burst in throat 8/9/13 - Peg in 9/3/13 - Radiation starts 30 IMRT, 60gy BOT, 56gy both sides of neck 10/14/13 - Radiation ended! 11/12/13 - PEG out!
| | | | Joined: Mar 2011 Posts: 1,024 "OCF Kiwi Down Under" Patient Advocate (1000+ posts) | "OCF Kiwi Down Under" Patient Advocate (1000+ posts) Joined: Mar 2011 Posts: 1,024 | Hmm. If this was me or my family I would definitely get the chemo. You had 5 positive nodes. That would be enough for me. This is a nasty aggressive cancer, hit it hard first time. Just my opinion. Tammy
Caregiver/advocate to Husband Kris age 59@ diagnosis DX Dec '10 SCC BOT T4aN2bM0 HPV+ve.Cisplatin x3 35 IMRT. PET 6/11 clear. R) level 2-4 neck dissection 8/1/11 to remove residual node - necrotic with NED Feb '12 Ca back.. 3/8/12 total glossectomy/laryngectomy/bilat neck dissection/partial pharyngectomy etc. clear margins. All nodes negative for disease. PEG in. March 2017 - 5 years disease free. Woohoo!
| | | | Joined: Jul 2012 Posts: 3,267 Likes: 4 Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Jul 2012 Posts: 3,267 Likes: 4 | I can see where the doctors are split. Chemo is recommended for adverse features, and according to your information, there are two, one is the pN5 nodal disease, two above the N3 adverse features, and other is one being in level IV in the cervical neck, unless they re-staged after surgery to N0. Usually oral cancer is mainly in nodes in levels I-lll, if it metastasizes, and not as much in level IV a small percentage.
Good luck
10/09 T1N2bM0 Tonsil 11/09 Taxo Cisp 5-FU, 6 Months Hosp 01/11 35 IMRT 70Gy 7 Wks 06/11 30 HBO 08/11 RND PNI 06/12 SND PNI LVI 08/12 RND Pec Flap IORT 12 Gy 10/12 25 IMRT 50Gy 6 Wks Taxo Erbitux 10/13 SND 10/13 TBO/Angiograph 10/13 RND Carotid Remove IORT 10Gy PNI 12/13 25 Protons 50Gy 6 Wks Carbo 11/14 All Teeth Extract 30 HBO 03/15 Sequestromy Buccal Flap ORN 09/16 Mandibulectomy Fib Flap Sternotomy 04/17 Regraft hypergranulation Donor Site 06/17 Heart Attack Stent 02/19 Finally Cancer Free Took 10 yrs
| | | | Joined: Jan 2013 Posts: 1,293 Likes: 1 Patient Advocate (1000+ posts) | Patient Advocate (1000+ posts) Joined: Jan 2013 Posts: 1,293 Likes: 1 | Angela,
First, do not start treatment until you are totally totally comfortable with your plan. You have to trust your doctors and the prescribed plan; your life depends on this.
Chemo with rads is very common. The radiation is doing the cancer killing, the chemo is to help the radiation do its job. Concurrent chemo may kill of some micro cancer cells but no doctor is going to suggest that the chemo is there to kill any cancer cells.
Since the concurrent chemo is done to improve the radiation then why not do it? The downsides of chemo are much smaller when compared to the side effects, both short and long term of the radiation. Plus weekly dosing offers much less side effects.
Get a second opinion if you feel that will help. Do consider getting more opinions may just make the waters more muddy and certainly no guarantee it will result in a clear decision.
The tumor board being split is really not a bad thing per say. Each doctor has bias so in less clear cut cases their bias swings their opinion.
Doing both is safe and within the standard of care guidelines. If you feel like you want to do all that is possible to kill the beast and do all you can to kill it off then getting both is that path.
Sparing yourself some side effects of not having chemo seems a small price to spare for just the peace of mind you and your team gave it all the first time around.
Good luck Don
Don Male, 57 - Great health except C Dec '12 DX: BOT SCC T2N2bMx, Stage 4a, HPV+, multiple nodes 1 tooth out Jan '13 2nd tooth out Tumor Board -induction TPF (3 cycles), seq CRT 4-6/2013 CRT 70gr 2x35, weekly carbo150 ended 5/29,6/4 All the details, join at http://beatdown.cognacom.com | | | | Joined: Nov 2013 Posts: 104 Senior Member (100+ posts) | Senior Member (100+ posts) Joined: Nov 2013 Posts: 104 | I told my docs to nuke it from orbit. I asked for chemo and rads. The docs were a little surprised but agreed and said as you wish.
The rads TX is not fun, very painful and the chemo adds only a small amount of discomfort that will pass much sooner than later in the whole scheme of things.
Brian Stage IV TxN2aM0 HPV+ SCC 38 y.o. male 9/20/13 Sentinel Node Found 12/5/13 Start of 72Gy and 5 bags of Cisplatin 1/21/14 Treatment Ends 1/25/15 1 Yr clear
| | | | Joined: Dec 2010 Posts: 5,264 Likes: 5 "OCF Canuck" Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | "OCF Canuck" Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Dec 2010 Posts: 5,264 Likes: 5 | Hey... With the number of lymphnodes involved I'd push for chemo, chemo is meant to soften up any remaining cancer so it is more easily damaged by radiation. It essentially boosts the radiation. I would not want to walk away at the end of this and say... Should I have? Particularly if you are faced with a recurrence.
Chemo in this case isn't a hold over (as in... Well if the rads doesn't work we'll try chemo... Sadly no chemo will work on this cancer... Unless there's a new trial drug out there that we haven't heard about. I would throw the book at it now if you can. Hugs.
Cheryl : Irritation - 2004 BX: 6/2008 : Inflam. BX: 12/10, DX: 12/10 : SCC - LS tongue well dif. T2N1M0. 2/11 hemigloss + recon. : PND - 40 nodes - 39 clear. 3/11 - 5/11 IMRT 33 + cis x2, PEG 3/28/11 - 5/19/11 3 head, 2 chest scans - clear(fingers crossed) HPV-, No smoke, drink, or drugs, Vegan
| | | | Joined: Mar 2014 Posts: 286 "OCF Down Under" Gold Member (200+ posts) | "OCF Down Under" Gold Member (200+ posts) Joined: Mar 2014 Posts: 286 | Why would you think the doctors would give it to you if you didn't need it? Why would they order an expensive, difficult treatment if it wouldn't help you?
I think you've asked the wrong question. You don't ask the doctors for chemo, you ask them about chemo. I don't understand why you would be talking to an RO about chemo. You should be discussing that with a a medical oncologist, not a radio oncologist. Now I'm a bit confused about how you are in this situation, maybe I've missed something. I don't know where you are, I presume the US somewhere? In Australia they call it a clinic, I believe in the US you call it a board, where a range of specialists (MOs, ROs, ENTs, dentists, speech pathologists, dietitians) review your case together. They discuss and decide the course of treatment, each specialty discusses the implications of the treatment from their perspective. For example the RO says we're going to do IMRT, the dentist points out that you'll need xyz teeth extracted.
You should not be in a position of having to "choose". Professionals who know a lot more about this than us should be deciding on the best course of treatment and explaining to you how it works. As it was explained to me and as Cheryld just said, it softens up the cancer so the radiation can better kill it.
And if there really was a coin toss either way and they did offer you two choices, I'm with Brian. Nuke it from orbit! I think that is a common feeling, get this out of me and do whatever you need to to prevent it ever coming back. Cheers, Dave (OzMojo) 19Feb2014 Diagnosed T2N2bM0 P16+ve SCC Tonsil. 31Mar2014 2 Cisplatin, 70gy over 7 weeks (completed 16May2014) 11August2014 PET/CT clear. 17July2019 5 years NED.
| | |
Forums23 Topics18,243 Posts197,126 Members13,313 | Most Online1,788 Jan 23rd, 2025 | | | |