Thanks again, Brian, for continuing to try to get these people to get the facts right. I read the VELscope article first and noticed everything you mentioned to them. A couple of other points, although minor, showed there was poor research done for the article:

1. They referred to the VELscope as being a "thin wand-like" device, which they obviously mixed up with ViziLite

2. The mispelled ViziLite.

Although these are minor compared the statstical misinformation etc., it just shows that they didn't do a good job in checking out the facts.

As you know, I have received and forwarded to you two papers from my ViziLite rep attacking the VELscope. Never received anything the other way around.

Thanks for continuing to be the watchdog and helping to keep theses people honest in their claims.

Jerry