Your discussion about IMRT vs. "regular" radiation made me curious and I emailed my Rad. Onc. and asked him what kind of radiation treatment I had. His one word answer was "regular". I cannot help but wonder: If M.D.Anderson is the top cancer hospital in America and IMRT is clearly superior, then why was I treated with "regular" radiation?
Is it really that clear that IMRT is better? Is a different protocol used depending upon what stage one is in and how far the cancer has spread to lymph nodes?

Danny G.