Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 3,552 | PET scans are done by first giving an IV of glucose that has a radioactive marker. Cancer cells have a higher uptake of sugar than regular cells so it tends to concentrate the radiation which is then read by the scanner. It is a long scan and painless. The accuracy is enhanced if combined with CT. If you are healing from radiation and/or surgery there is a possibility of more false positives where healing is taking place. All scan modalities have a certain degree of false positives and are never used as a single diagnostic tool, merely an adjunct to the biopsy, palpation exam, nasolarynoscope, MRI, blood work, tumor markers, CT and mirrors.
PET/CT's have shown reading up to 98% accuracy. PET alone is a little lower.
Most of us have had PET scans for the original workup. Some have regular PET scans as part of their follow-up protocol.
Gary Allsebrook *********************************** Dx 11/22/02, SCC, 6 x 3 cm Polypoid tumor, rt tonsil, Stage III/IVA, T3N0M0 G1/2 Tx 1/28/03 - 3/19/03, Cisplatin ct x2, IMRT, bilateral, with boost, x35(69.96Gy) ________________________________________________________ "You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes" (James 4:14 NIV)
|