|
#52568 05-04-2002 06:11 PM | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 4,912 Likes: 52 OCF Founder Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) | OCF Founder Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts) Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 4,912 Likes: 52 | Obviously both accomplish the same thing. As recently as 5-6 years ago it was always done through the nose, as that was the current technology. (Imagine long-term treatment this way and walking around the world with a tube out of your nose for months and months. As if everything else being done to you wasn't humiliating enough.) Techniques and products have improved and other alternatives to the nasal insertion are now available. The only reason to use the nasal tube these days is when the doctors believe that the tube is only going to be needed for a very short time, and they wish to avoid the minor surgery to place one through the stomach wall. I have heard that there are still some places that are not up to speed on the new/better stomach tubes and still use the nasal route for long term feeding, but most of these are outside the US.
Brian, stage 4 oral cancer survivor. OCF Founder and Director. The first responsibility of a leader is to define reality. The last is to say thank you. In between, the leader is a servant. | | |
Forums23 Topics18,168 Posts196,927 Members13,104 | Most Online458 Jan 16th, 2020 | | | |
|