This is the type of post that causes confusion here. 2 inches under my comment that 3D is middle of the technological scale, it is pointed out that it is old technology. This could lead the newcomer to think that older is somehow not as good. I am undergoing 3D as we speak because it is the appropriate delivery method for my situation, like Sheldon, post operative. I walk right past the IMRT system knowing it is not for me. The long timers here know these systems, their good points and bad. Many times the posts here sell people pipe dreams of reduced side effects in spite of the obvious and, additionally, cause them to unnecessarily question the medical advice they are getting. Most people here that, as is the case with Jen, had nodal involvement did not get IMRT. I hope they don't use standard radiation, that stuff is almost 100 years old.

Glenn