|
#41281 05-25-2007 04:14 AM | Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 131 Gold Member (100+ posts) | OP Gold Member (100+ posts) Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 131 | Thank you David for your reply. It is a difficult question, but I wondered what some of the people here in the forum thought. My understanding from a lay persons view is that it kills all the good and bad cells in the body not really sure of the details either. When you think of it... what cells?? I also believe it works with the radiation, killing the cancerous cells and takes good cells with it. I would like to know what other people think on this subject. Thank you again. Carol...
Carol CG to Husband age 60 Stage IV SCC right tonsil T4AN2B tx rad x 35 chemo x 2 Currently after treatment no sign of cancer in throat. (all clear to date)
| | |
Entire Thread
|
2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| mommapez | 05-25-2007 09:11 AM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| davidcpa | 05-25-2007 09:43 AM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| Kris | 05-25-2007 11:12 AM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| mommapez | 05-25-2007 11:14 AM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| mommapez | 05-25-2007 11:17 AM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| Nelie | 05-25-2007 12:56 PM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| Gary | 05-25-2007 08:38 PM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| JoAnne1981 | 05-26-2007 09:12 PM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| lee33 | 05-29-2007 11:09 PM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| mommapez | 05-31-2007 09:45 PM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| JT2 | 06-01-2007 03:34 AM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| mommapez | 06-01-2007 09:39 AM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| davidcpa | 06-01-2007 05:01 PM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| DM32ASA | 06-01-2007 09:47 PM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| davidcpa | 06-02-2007 10:42 AM |
Re: 2nd Chemo, but NO 3rd Chemo
| mommapez | 06-02-2007 11:36 AM | |
Forums23 Topics18,263 Posts197,173 Members13,357 | Most Online1,788 Jan 23rd, 2025 | | | |
|