I think few people here actually interact or even know their pathologist that did the original or subsequent diagnosis. So this is perhaps the wrong crowd to ask this question of. You would think that any attorney that is taking on this case would have resources to find appropriate professionals to offer their opinions. Clearly errors are made far too often, and it is possible that like attorneys who do not like to sue other attorneys there is a reluctance for doctors to testify against other doctors. But if this is a case of gross negligence, then the attorney should be able to get someone to step forward. Having had more biopsies read than I care to count, I could not tell you who the pathologists were on any of them without asking for my records from my treatment facility. I'm sorry this is not helpful, but I just wanted you to consider why the number of replies to this might be very low.