Trial design is much more straightforward if you are looking at one factor at a time - the addition (or not) of a single chemo agent, or the radiotherapy fractionation protocol. If you design a trial that has multiple factors, it's harder to tell definatively which tweek gave better results, or if it was the combination that did it. Science Daily had another article that explains a combination. It is way pre-clinical (unless you are a fruit fly) but very interesting and less depressing that the cancer and the Darwinian cancer evolution one:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120615141716.htm

Maria


CG to husband - SCC Tonsil T1N2M0 HPV+ Never Smoker
First symptoms 7/2010, DX 12/2010
TX 40 IRMT (1.8 gy) + 10 Cetuximab
PET Scans 6/2011 + 3/2012 clear, 5 year physical exam clear; chest CT's clear of cancer. On thyroid pills. Life is good.