Zeb

Your posting to a QUACK doctor's web's site violates the rules of this OCF forum. I have asked the moderators to delete these links but you should do it yourself.
Here is the full story on the doctor who runs this Quack shop: he is a fraud and even Blue Cross insurance had to bounce him.
[quote]The Medical Board of California has disciplined Bicher three times. In 1995, the Board filed an accusation that ultimately resulted in an order for 18 months' probation from 1995 to 1997. In 2004, in response to new charges, an Administrative Law Judge made a convoluted ruling ... he concluded that Bicher had (a) been grossly and repeatedly negligent, (b) failed to maintain adequate records, and (c) exaggerated the value of hyperthermia. (Hyperthermia is a type of cancer treatment in which body tissue is exposed to temperatures of up to 113�F. Local and regional hyperthermia may enhance the effect of radiation and chemotherapy for a few cancers. However, the judge ruled that VCI's site had improperly claimed that hyperthermia was highly effective on its own and was suitable for anyone at any age.) After considering the judge's findings, the board placed Bicher on five years' probation, during which he was required to engage a practice monitor or participate in a professional enhancement program that included periodic assessment of his work. Bicher surrendered his New York State license in 2005.

In July 2006, Bicher signed a stipulated settlement under which he admitted no wrongdoing but agreed to have his probationary period extended for two additional years. During this period, he was required to (a) complete an extensive training and assessment program and (b) refrain from using unconventional hyperthermia or radiation treatment protocols that do not have approval of an Institutional Review Board.
... The Blue Cross investigation was initiated, in part, because of excessive insurance billings they received from Respondent for hyperthermia and radiation treatments concerning 4 or 5 patients. It was the position of Blue Cross that the radiation doses administered at Respondent's direction at the Valley Cancer Institute (VCI) were so low the radiation treatment did not benefit the patients. In addition, Blue Cross further alleged that the medical records received from VCI for patient J.G. were altered. This was determined after patient J.G. provided Blue Cross with a copy of her medical records which she had obtained herself from Respondent. When compared with the records Respondent provided to Blue Cross, it was apparent that J.G.'s medical records had been altered to reflect that she had refused treatment. Respondent resigned his Blue Cross membership while still under investigation.

The evidence established that the radiation dosages per treatment, the frequency of hyperthermia treatments, the number of hyperthermia treatments per patient, and the manner of utilization of micro thermocouples was below the standard of good medical practice in the community.
.[/quote]

STOP POSTING BOGUS CURES HERE.
Charm