Susan,

My facility had brand new IG-IMRT machines. They also had a Tomo machine. My RO and the two other second opinions I received preferred the IMRT. I looked into the Tomo and asked about it and they said that they preferred the IMRT to Tomo because it was more versatile (not sure what that means)

I got the feeling that they preferred the IMRT because they just bought them (did they need to pay down that cost?). I might be wrong on that. I was very interested in the Tomo because it is said to have more aiming spots and thus less tissue damage. My RO said this was not the case.

I would be very interested in what Sloan has to say about this issue, as I was never fully convinced that IG-IMRT was better than Tomo. Please post and let me know their opinion.

BTW I know that I am now post treatment and this is just curiosity. I also know that my case is not the same as your husbands, and my results are great so far so no complaints but still curious.


Kelly
Male
48, SCC (Soft Palet) Rt.,
Stage 1, T3n0m0,
Dx, 8-09, Start IMRT 35 9-2-09 end 10-21-09
04-20-10 NED
8-11 recurrence, node rt. neck N2b
10-11 33 IMRT w/chemo wkly
3-12-12 PET - residual cancer
4-12 5 treatments with Cyberknife & Erbitux
6-19-12 Pet scan CLEAR
12-3-12 PET - CLEAR