Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#57283 11-09-2005 02:59 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11
ash_fx Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11
Hi,

This is about a scan called PET (I'm not sure what it stands for) that is supposed to differentiate cancer cells from normal with an accuracy higher than any other scan system available (they say accuracy is higher than 95 percent). Have any of you used/heard of this being used? This just became available in India and we are thinking about using it if needed (for an 8-wk-post-rx scan to determine the nature of a lymph node that's still persisting).

Ashwin.

#57284 11-09-2005 04:56 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,019
Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts)
Offline
Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts)

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,019
Ashwin,

I had a PET scan and an MRI to look at how I was doing three months after treatment. MY ENT made very clear to me that the PET scan, by itself, was likely to show a lot of "false positives" in terms of showing up spots that were still healing as being indistinguishable from spots where there could be cancer, which is why I also had the MRI. He also said three months after treatment was the earliest he would use a PET scan because it is very sensitive but also overly sensitive and picks up spots that are inflamed and irritated by treatment but not new cancer.

If this equipment is relatively new in India, I'd hope you could find someone familiar with these issues to interpret the PET scan for you so you don't get needlessly worried.

Nelie


SCC(T2N0M0) part.glossectomy & neck dissect 2/9/05 & 2/25/05.33 IMRT(66 Gy),2 Cisplatin ended 06/03/05.Stage I breast cancer treated 2/05-11/05.Surgery to remove esophageal stricture 07/06, still having dilatations to keep esophagus open.Dysphagia. "When you're going through hell, keep going"
#57285 11-09-2005 06:18 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,552
Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts)
Offline
Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts)

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,552
PET scans are done by first giving an IV of glucose that has a radioactive marker. Cancer cells have a higher uptake of sugar than regular cells so it tends to concentrate the radiation which is then read by the scanner. It is a long scan and painless. The accuracy is enhanced if combined with CT. If you are healing from radiation and/or surgery there is a possibility of more false positives where healing is taking place. All scan modalities have a certain degree of false positives and are never used as a single diagnostic tool, merely an adjunct to the biopsy, palpation exam, nasolarynoscope, MRI, blood work, tumor markers, CT and mirrors.

PET/CT's have shown reading up to 98% accuracy. PET alone is a little lower.

Most of us have had PET scans for the original workup. Some have regular PET scans as part of their follow-up protocol.


Gary Allsebrook
***********************************
Dx 11/22/02, SCC, 6 x 3 cm Polypoid tumor, rt tonsil, Stage III/IVA, T3N0M0 G1/2
Tx 1/28/03 - 3/19/03, Cisplatin ct x2, IMRT, bilateral, with boost, x35(69.96Gy)
________________________________________________________
"You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes" (James 4:14 NIV)
#57286 11-11-2005 03:48 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 2
Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts)
Offline
Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts)

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 2
The other important factor in PET/CT (positron emmission tomography) scans is that ongoing scans are always compared to a benchmark scan shortly after treatment to pinpoint areas that are increasing in size as well.

I saw a study in a 2004 Journal of Otolaryngology with results of 100% accuracy relative to false negatives.

Ed


SCC Stage IV, BOT, T2N2bM0
Cisplatin/5FU x 3, 40 days radiation
Diagnosis 07/21/03 tx completed 10/08/03
Post Radiation Lower Motor Neuron Syndrome 3/08.
Cervical Spinal Stenosis 01/11
Cervical Myelitis 09/12
Thoracic Paraplegia 10/12
Dysautonomia 11/12
Hospice care 09/12-01/13.
COPD 01/14
Intermittent CHF 6/15
Feeding tube NPO 03/16
VFI 12/2016
ORN 12/2017
Cardiac Event 06/2018
Bilateral VFI 01/2021
Thoracotomy Bilobectomy 01/2022
Bilateral VFI 05/2022
Total Laryngectomy 01/2023
#57287 11-11-2005 08:48 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 116
Gold Member (100+ posts)
Offline
Gold Member (100+ posts)

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 116
I had a PET scan and it was good confirmation that my cancer did not spread and it was contained to my tonsils. Again as the others of said its a nother view of things that help determine the treatment or condition.


SCC R-Tonsil T2 NO MO Dec 2003. Completed IMRT Radiation only to tonsils(72Gy) and neck(55Gy)March 04. Detected at age 50.
#57288 11-11-2005 05:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,912
Likes: 52
OCF Founder
Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts)
Offline
OCF Founder
Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts)

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,912
Likes: 52
A test which finds all kinds of things, disease or not will have a very high number if you are looking at false negatives.... the problem is specificity. When you are looking for a particular "trait" of a disease and not the disease itself as in PET scans, the problem is not false negatives, it is a high degree of false positives. Gary has this right and it has been stated here before. Scanning technologies are only part of the puzzle when it comes to knowing what is going on for sure.


Brian, stage 4 oral cancer survivor. OCF Founder and Director. The first responsibility of a leader is to define reality. The last is to say thank you. In between, the leader is a servant.
#57289 11-11-2005 07:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 663
"Above & Beyond" Member (300+ posts)
Offline
"Above & Beyond" Member (300+ posts)

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 663
Just a note I would add in agreement with Ed's comment and in particular to head and neck cancer. When diagnosing, a PET scan does have issues with false positives because of the uniqueness of the way that the salivary and swallowing functions occur.

The doctor explained that unlike most any other part of the body, the functions that are happening in our mouths an throats cause the cells to burn more energy thereby uptaking a more significant amount of glucose than cells in other parts of the body. Because the PET scan is looking for the rapid uptake of glucose it will sometimes show bright areas in the head and neck region that are not cancerous but that appear on the scans because of the normal functions of this part of the body.

This goes in line with why the docs must wait for a significant period of time after treatment to do these tests since the treatments can also cause the cells to become hyperactive with glucose intake and the readings are not of much value.

Ultimately I must agree with Brian. There is not a single test or tool that can tell you everything you need to know. It is the old whole is the sum of its parts routine. By using multiple tests that have their individual advantages, the docs can get a fuller and clearer picture and that is the best way to tackle cancer in my opinion.

Harry is going for his second PET scan (first since completing treatment) and they will do a CTscan as well. They also do regular blood tests and then the doctor puts all of this information together to determine if things are rolling along fine or if something needs to be addressed.

Harry said once that while he hates doing so many tests he finds a peace of mind that they are getting the whole picture the more they do so he does them all.

Good Luck!

Cindy


Caregiver to ex-husband Harry. Dx 12/10/04 SCC stg 3, BOT with 2 nodes left side. No surg/chemo x4 /rad.x37(rad comp. 03/29/05)Cisplatin/5FU(comp. 05/07/05)-T1N2M0-(cancer free 06/14/05)-(12/10/06) 2 yr. Survivor!!!
#57290 11-12-2005 03:20 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 274
Platinum Member (200+ posts)
Offline
Platinum Member (200+ posts)

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 274
I believe the true value of the PET is to screen for Mets to other areas. There is a lot going on in the H and N area.


Moderated by  Eva Grayzel 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Top Posters
ChristineB 10,507
davidcpa 8,311
Cheryld 5,260
EzJim 5,260
Brian Hill 4,912
Newest Members
Jina, VintageMel, rahul320, Sean916, Megm37
13,103 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums23
Topics18,166
Posts196,921
Members13,103
Most Online458
Jan 16th, 2020
OCF Awards

Great Nonprofit OCF 2023 Charity Navigator OCF Guidestar Charity OCF

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5