Hi, I've been on the internet trying to find out more about this condition my periodontist says I have. After a biopsy over a week ago, he says that I have pre-cancerous cells and wants me to go to an oral surgeon for a second biopsy. The diagnosis is his words is "Hyperkeratosis with mild to moderate epithelial dysplasia. Dysplasia is present at the margins."

My husband has been a smoker his entire life, I have never smoked. I do drink an occasional beer or glass of wine. I am wondering if use of sacharine (like sweet-n-low) could be the culprit. I guess I'm feeling like I don't deserve this.

I suppose I'll go to that oral surgeon, but health insurance & money is a big problem right now since I'm unemployed. Comments and suggestions are welcome.

Thanks.

It happens....I went through radiation therapy with a young man, never smoked, but was told that he may have come into contact with a carcinagen while working in a chemical plant as a younger man.
Who knows, what causes cancer? Nobody, for sure,,,
Darrell

We come into contact with so many different chemicals and combinations of chemicals on a daily basis.
I think that if you get through life without encountering cancer in some form, you are lucky....
Darrell

How would you define the word "pre-cancerous"?

My Periodontist said it meant you could have cancer but you don't yet. In my mind, that would mean everybody (that doesn't already have cancer) is pre-cancerous since they don't have cancer yet but could. What is the difference?

Linda,
Believe me when I say that no one, not a smoker nor a nonsmoker, deserves this cancer. It is a myth that only smokers develop oral cancer, and, IMHO, I feel it's coming to light that the number of smokers with this cancer are fewer then expected. There is lots coming out concerning the HPV virus being the cause. So, lose the thoughts about deserving a cancer, no one does but many of us get it.
Sounds like what your doc is saying is that you have abnormal cells that need to be watched. Have it looked at and monitored and let us know what the oral surgeon says.

After his surgery Bob was told he still had some displasia at the margins. The way it was explained to us is that the cells are abnormal but not cancer abnormal. They could develop into cancerous cells or they can just stay displasiac which is what they consider a precancerous condition versus "normal cells". It does not mean you going to develop cancer but there is greater likely hood.
In Bob's case because he actually had cancerous cells removed surgically he was give the choice to watch and wait being carefully monitored or do radiation. If I understand your situation correctly you should be checked on a very regular basis to determine if there are any changes to the displasia.
This is just a curious question and you don't have to answer but have you ever tested positive for HPV virus? There are studies researching a possible link between HPV and squamous cell cancers (oral and cervical). As Darrell said there is no definitive answer to why me?
The things they attribute to causing cancers are only risk factors identified that seem to increase your chances but not every smoker gets cancer and some seriously health conscious people develop unlikely problems.
Here's to your displasiac cells staying happy to be a little abnormal and may they not aspire to anything more.
Peace Denise

Then general term of dysplasia is as simple as a cell, (or even an organ) which is not normal. However, when oncologists refer to dysplastic cells, they are comparing them to surrounding cells of the same type. No cell goes from normal to malignant without a variety of in-between transformations. These alterations of various components of the cell make it dysplastic. Some alterations are more ominous than others, an enlarged nucleus for instance is very characteristic of cells that are malignant, while other changes a few in the mitochondria, would qualify as dysplastic but not necessarily one of the changes commonly seen in cells in transition to full blown malignancy. Daughter cells produced as these dysplastic cells replicate need further genetic alteration to finally become a malignant cell. One of the most common characteristics of malignant cells besides the enlarged nucleus is the lack of p-53 which is the gene that causes natural apoptosis, or programmed cell death. One commonality in cancer cells is that they are (without p-53) essentially immortal. So while dysplasia is a general term, on a cellular level there are different dysplasias - some of greater concern than others. Of course one of the great mysteries is why some dysplastic cells go on to further changes and others do not.

As to cause, few will ever know for sure. In oral cancers, non-smokers exposed to second hand smoke for long periods would raise an eyebrow, ditto HPV 16 or 18 positive cells. But in the development of malignancy, without the introduction of a known causative agent such as the 400 carcinogens produced in tobacco combustion, we are essentially clueless. In some cases we are still guessing. The recent loss of Reeve to lung cancer is being discussed heavily, and the

Brian
Thank you for the real deal explaination.
It really helps make the process all the more clear.
Peace Denise

That was the "Readers Digest" version. If you really want to know about the transformation process and the genetics of cancer here is the link to the page in the main body of the OCF web site that I researched and put together (with significant help, and permission to use parts of other's material) four years ago. http://www.oralcancerfoundation.org/facts/cancer_genetics.htm

It's more than you'll ever want to know......

OK, I went to the oral surgeon today. I took the written report from my periodontist to the oral surgeon. First thing, he went right for my mouth and did not look me in the eye and introduce himself to me. That always ticks me off.

He took a look in my mouth and asked me if I sucked on lozenges a lot. I said not much, maybe one or two a day and I was talking about those starlight mints, not lozenges with medicine in them. Him and his nurse laughed and said that was a lot. I said you got to be kidding, I know people who suck on them all day long.

He went in another room and called my Periodontist on the phone & I listened to his side of the conversation. He told the periodontist about my "so-called excessive use of lozenges".

Then he came back in the room and told me to cut out the sucking on lozenges. I got mad and told him that one or two mints a day wasn't a problem and that was just an estimate anyway, many days I don't have any at all. Then I told him how "jerked around" I was feeling since the other doctor told me I might have cancer and then he was telling me it was all because of mints.

Anyway, I let them set me up an appointment in two weeks for another biopsy, but I'm thinking about cancelling the whole thing. At this point, I really do feel "jerked around" by doctors and I feel like just dropping the whole matter. But, what if it is really something serious wrong?