Just a heads up that three well meaning but gullible friends all excitedly mailed me that infamous "John (sic) Hopkins" cancer newsletter. Here is the Snopes link debunking it with the actual email :
snopes Johns Hopkins If you read it, you can see why I sometimes get a little feisty here as people post rather similar "therapies".
Actually Johns Hopkins itself posted a nice rebuttal
Johns Hopkins cancer rebuttal I especially like Johns Hopkin's tell it like it is paragraph:
[quote]Email hoax contention #4 and #5: Cancer is caused by Nutritional Deficiencies and Supplements Will Correct Them
Dietary habits and lifestyle choices, such as smoking, contribute to the development of many human cancers, says Kimmel Cancer Center director William Nelson. Our experts recommend a balanced diet (see response #11) as a way of reducing cancer risk. In terms of supplements, Nelson points out that while they may help mediate vitamin deficiencies, taking doses above what the body needs provides no added benefit.[/quote]
[quote]Email hoax contentions #11, 12, 13, and 14: Cancers Feed on Certain Foods
The premise is that cancer cells feed on certain foods, and if a person refrains from eating these foods, the cancer will die. According to our experts, a poor diet and obesity associated with a poor diet is a risk factor for the development of cancer. However, there is no evidence that certain foods alter the environment of an existing cancer, at the cellular level, and cause it to either die or grow.
While there is such a thing as tumors that produce mucus, the mucus made by a tumor does not result from drinking milk. And, eating less meat, while a good choice for cancer prevention, does not free up enzymes to attack cancer cells, explains cancer prevention and control expert Elizabeth Platz.[/quote]
Charm
