Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#143424 11-29-2011 06:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 225
samkl Offline OP
"OCF Down Under"
Gold Member (200+ posts)
OP Offline
"OCF Down Under"
Gold Member (200+ posts)

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 225
Simon is now 3 weeks post treatment. The external radiation burns have healed and his ENT has scoped down his throat and said it looks very good.

He has asked the ENT about the scanning schedule, and she has said a PET scan 12 weeks after rads finish, and there-on just visual/scope down the throat examination by her. What if a tumour is growing inside tissue where she can't see it? How do things like that get picked up or do they only get picked up once they start to bulge? She also said you'll know if you've got a recurrance when you get discomfort.

She says the PET will only pick up something at least 1 cm and that the scans are damaging anyway.

I notice on many people's signature they seem to have annual PET scans. Can anyone advise me?


Brother 49yo DX 22/6/11 Tonsil SCC HPV+ Stage IV T4N1(?)M0. Carbo/docetaxel (Taxotere)19/7, 11/8 (with E-tux), 1/9; E-tux 11/8, 25/8, 15/9, 30/9, 14/10, 28/10; IMRT X 35 (70gy tumour;63gy nodes;56gy gen area) 19/9-4/11/11. Clear PET scan 1/2/12. 1 and 2 year post treatment checks good.
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 638
klo Offline
"OCF Down Under"
"Above & Beyond" Member (500+ posts)
Offline
"OCF Down Under"
"Above & Beyond" Member (500+ posts)

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 638
Same same with my Alex.

I was beside myself thinking that they weren't treating Alex properly and like you, wondered how could they possibly see a recurrence in time? So in my typical arrogant (I prefer the term pro-active) fashion I went looking for the research to bash the oncologists over the head with and discovered that yes indeed, scan is recommended within 6 months of treatment (ours was 12 weeks which seems to be the norm in our neck of the woods) and then "as indicated based on signs/symptoms; not routinely recommended for asymptomatic patients". This is quoted from the US NCCN guidelines - Head and Neck (oropharyngeal section and which links to follow up (FOLL-A). Guidelines are on this site but I can never find them so have my own link that I refer to all the time (sorry Brian).

Most disappointed and live in hope that the guidelines will one day change to allow Alex to have a PET after his Weeties every day (assuming that one day he will actually be able to eat Weeties smile ).

But seriously, I suppose there are so many things going on in the body, that if you had a PET every year, you would eventually turn up with a positive associated with infection, scar tissue or whatever which would be just as useful as tits on a bull.


Karen
Love of Life to Alex T4N2M0 SCC Tonsil, BOT, R lymph nodes
Dx March 2010 51yrs. Unresectable. HPV+ve
Tx Chemo x 3+1 cycles(cisplatin,docetaxel,5FU)- complete May 31
Chemoradiation (IMRTx35 + weekly cisplatin)
Finish Aug 27
Return to work 2 years on
3 years out Aug 27 2013 NED smile
Still underweight
klo #143447 11-30-2011 01:16 PM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 945
"Above & Beyond" Member (500+ posts)
Offline
"Above & Beyond" Member (500+ posts)

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 945
samkl, remember that the physical examination by a skilled ENT is a pretty powerful test in and of itself. I'm like Karen, though, and wish there was the post Weeties (or in our case, oatmeal) daily check.


CG to husband - SCC Tonsil T1N2M0 HPV+ Never Smoker
First symptoms 7/2010, DX 12/2010
TX 40 IRMT (1.8 gy) + 10 Cetuximab
PET Scans 6/2011 + 3/2012 clear, 5 year physical exam clear; chest CT's clear of cancer. On thyroid pills. Life is good.
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 225
samkl Offline OP
"OCF Down Under"
Gold Member (200+ posts)
OP Offline
"OCF Down Under"
Gold Member (200+ posts)

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 225
I've just read through the NCCN follow-up recommendations and it says

"Post treatment baseline imaging of primary (and neck if treated) recommended within 6 mo of treatment*. Further reimaging as indicated based on signs/symptoms; not routinely recommended for asymptomatic patients."

and also later clarifies "For cancer of the orapharynx ..... imaging recommended for T3-4 and N2-3 disease only."
Why do they recommend this course of (non)action. Is it just because of the concern with false positives or excessive radiation? If so, why don't they do fine-needle aspirations and biopsies of the treatment areas? Or do they assume all is oK there and the potential problem is more distant metastases?



Brother 49yo DX 22/6/11 Tonsil SCC HPV+ Stage IV T4N1(?)M0. Carbo/docetaxel (Taxotere)19/7, 11/8 (with E-tux), 1/9; E-tux 11/8, 25/8, 15/9, 30/9, 14/10, 28/10; IMRT X 35 (70gy tumour;63gy nodes;56gy gen area) 19/9-4/11/11. Clear PET scan 1/2/12. 1 and 2 year post treatment checks good.
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 945
"Above & Beyond" Member (500+ posts)
Offline
"Above & Beyond" Member (500+ posts)

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 945
I believe that it's balancing the risk of the additional PET/CT radiation vs. the benefit of using it to check up on the more advanced (by T or N) cancer.

When my husband was initally checked out for a mystery earache, the CT scan showed a swollen node, but no tumor. His doctor at the HMO we belong too did a FNA of his swollen node - fluid came out, but it was clear for cancer and infection. The needle didn't hit the cancerous part. He also tried to do an in office throat biopsy - couldn't because of his gag reflex. If he had, that would have been negative too, because the cancer was not at the surface. Thank heavens, he didn't like the look of it, and escalated to the team at MetroHealth - otherwise he could have had 2 biopsies that showed nothing and stage III or IV cancer (depending on if a second node was involved or just signaling). Thats a long story, but what it boils down to is that I've got a lot of respect for a doctor's hands, mind and intuition - as well as for advanced diagnostic technology.

Forgot about the doctor's eyes and ear - a good one will look at the whole patient, and listen carefully to him or her. If the patient doesn't look too perky, or sounds unusually negative, there may be a clue that something is amiss. I like the thought of clear scans, but I am also happy when the doctor is satisfied at the end of the exam.

Last edited by Maria; 11-30-2011 06:16 PM. Reason: Addition

CG to husband - SCC Tonsil T1N2M0 HPV+ Never Smoker
First symptoms 7/2010, DX 12/2010
TX 40 IRMT (1.8 gy) + 10 Cetuximab
PET Scans 6/2011 + 3/2012 clear, 5 year physical exam clear; chest CT's clear of cancer. On thyroid pills. Life is good.
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 225
samkl Offline OP
"OCF Down Under"
Gold Member (200+ posts)
OP Offline
"OCF Down Under"
Gold Member (200+ posts)

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 225
It's hard to believe Simon is now 6 months out of treatment, and tomorrow is his 6 month check. I'm still a bit concerned that the check is not a scan, although I know that is within the current guidelines.

I have noticed again how many signatures have several PET results, and I must admit from a lay person's perspective I'd be a lot happier if he was scanned. I let you know how he goes.
Love to you all


Brother 49yo DX 22/6/11 Tonsil SCC HPV+ Stage IV T4N1(?)M0. Carbo/docetaxel (Taxotere)19/7, 11/8 (with E-tux), 1/9; E-tux 11/8, 25/8, 15/9, 30/9, 14/10, 28/10; IMRT X 35 (70gy tumour;63gy nodes;56gy gen area) 19/9-4/11/11. Clear PET scan 1/2/12. 1 and 2 year post treatment checks good.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,301
"OCF Down Under"
Patient Advocate (1000+ posts)
Offline
"OCF Down Under"
Patient Advocate (1000+ posts)

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,301
I am hoping for a great result for Simons 6 month check Linda.
I never had a scan of any kind but looking at your signature he did have a clear scan on the 1st February.
Love to you both,
Gabriele


History Leukoplakia bx 8/2006 SCC floor mouth T3N0M0- Verrucous Carcinoma.
14 hour 0p SCC-Right ND/excision/marginal mandibulectomy 9/2006, 4 teeth removed, flap from wrist, trach-ng 6 days- no chemo/rad.
6 ops and debulking (flap/tongue join) + bx's 2006-2012.
bx Jan 2012 Hyperkeratosis-Epithelial Dysplasia
24cm GIST tumour removed 8/2013. Indefinite Oral Chemo.

1/31/16 passed away peacefully surrounded by family

Gabe #149020 05-03-2012 05:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,260
Likes: 3
"OCF Canuck"
Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts)
Offline
"OCF Canuck"
Patient Advocate (old timer, 2000 posts)

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,260
Likes: 3
Fingers crossed for you guys... Good luck!


Cheryl : Irritation - 2004 BX: 6/2008 : Inflam. BX: 12/10, DX: 12/10 : SCC - LS tongue well dif. T2N1M0. 2/11 hemigloss + recon. : PND - 40 nodes - 39 clear. 3/11 - 5/11 IMRT 33 + cis x2, PEG 3/28/11 - 5/19/11 3 head, 2 chest scans - clear(fingers crossed) HPV-, No smoke, drink, or drugs, Vegan
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 225
samkl Offline OP
"OCF Down Under"
Gold Member (200+ posts)
OP Offline
"OCF Down Under"
Gold Member (200+ posts)

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 225
Thanks girls.


Brother 49yo DX 22/6/11 Tonsil SCC HPV+ Stage IV T4N1(?)M0. Carbo/docetaxel (Taxotere)19/7, 11/8 (with E-tux), 1/9; E-tux 11/8, 25/8, 15/9, 30/9, 14/10, 28/10; IMRT X 35 (70gy tumour;63gy nodes;56gy gen area) 19/9-4/11/11. Clear PET scan 1/2/12. 1 and 2 year post treatment checks good.
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 638
klo Offline
"OCF Down Under"
"Above & Beyond" Member (500+ posts)
Offline
"OCF Down Under"
"Above & Beyond" Member (500+ posts)

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 638
Hi Samkl

Like you, I thought that we were somehow being "ripped off" by not having any more scans after the first post treatment one, and like you, I was concerned because so many on this site had multiple scans.

I am now ok with the idea after reading as you have, that it is within guidelines and also realising a recurrent tumour would be visible to a doctor looking for it (or signs of it anyway). My reading suggests a visual check seems to be at least as good as a scan.

The only problem is that distant mets would not be picked up with visualisation. I still worry about this but the oncologist seems confident that careful history will point him in this direction should it be needed. Unsure what the pointers are but assume Alex might start feeling tired, losing weight again etc.

I figure that Alex is our oncologist's success story so he also has a vested interest in making sure no nasty distant metastasis sneaks up on us all.


Karen
Love of Life to Alex T4N2M0 SCC Tonsil, BOT, R lymph nodes
Dx March 2010 51yrs. Unresectable. HPV+ve
Tx Chemo x 3+1 cycles(cisplatin,docetaxel,5FU)- complete May 31
Chemoradiation (IMRTx35 + weekly cisplatin)
Finish Aug 27
Return to work 2 years on
3 years out Aug 27 2013 NED smile
Still underweight
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Eva Grayzel 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Top Posters
ChristineB 10,507
davidcpa 8,311
Cheryld 5,260
EzJim 5,260
Brian Hill 4,912
Newest Members
Jina, VintageMel, rahul320, Sean916, Megm37
13,103 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums23
Topics18,166
Posts196,921
Members13,103
Most Online458
Jan 16th, 2020
OCF Awards

Great Nonprofit OCF 2023 Charity Navigator OCF Guidestar Charity OCF

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5